I'm still making my way home from the Society for Philosophy and Psychology. The SPP had a good showing for extended cognition.
In a session on Embodied Cognition, Carlos Zedik of Indiana University, had a nice review of different sorts of dynamicist approaches to cognition in his “The Varieties of Dynamicism.” Such a review is helpful in breaking down the idea that there is just one moral one might draw from the application of the mathematics of dynamical systems in cognitive science.
David Michael Kaplan, WashU, tried to formulate a radical version of the embodied perception approach that does not rely on the claim that perception constitutively depends on action. I don’t think that he was entirely successful, but the problematic and its execution were clear. It begins as a way of trying to avoid the coupling-constitution fallacy.
Marcus Avran, U. British Columbia, presented a reply to Justin Fisher’s contention that everything mental is just in the head.
In a separate session, Rob Wilson discussed social cognition and extended cognition.
There were also two posters, one by Teed Rockwell, Sonoma State, and Shannon Spaulding, Wisconsin-Madison, taking Adams & Aizawa (and Rupert) to task. Zoe Drayson, Bristol, and George Theiner, Alberta, also had posters. (Alas, I didn’t get to talk with Zoe. I’m a conference slacker!)
So, SPP is extended cognition friendly and worth thinking about for presentations for next year.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment